News
[11/18]
Maine man sheds 140 pounds to join the Marines
[11/12]
W.Va. man beats health insurer in court over $40
[11/05]
Teen compacted in Wis. garbage truck, survives
More...
Articles
Motor Vehicle Insurance
In most states, the owner or driver of a vehicle must have motor vehicle insurance. This requirement provides some assurance that a person who is injured by the driver will receive some compensation for the injury. Most motor vehicle policies have several things in common.
More...
Common Health Insurance Terms
For most of us, reading a health insurance policy can be like trying to read a menu in a French restaurant-nearly impossible! With so many different terms, which mean so many different things, the following glossary may be a big help in reading and understanding your health insurance policy.
More...
|
|
Case Summaries
[11/19]
McDonald v. Sun Oil Co. In a suit arising out of the sale of a property containing a disused mercury mine, alleging negligence, contribution, breach of contract and fraud as a result of an alleged oral warranty that certain rock at the mine was free of mercury, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the state statute of repose did not render the negligence claim time-barred, because provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act amending state statute of limitations rules also applied to statutes of repose; 2) the contribution claim could not be brought without remedial action having been initiated by a state environmental agency; 3) the parol evidence rule was properly applied to find that the parties had reduced their entire agreement to writing and that no binding oral warranty existed; and 4) plaintiffs did not produce evidence of the alleged falsity of statements made by defendant.
[11/19]
Bregin v. Liquidebt Sys., Inc In a suit alleging retaliatory discharge and tortious interference with employment, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff did not identify any illegal acts which he was asked to commit, for which a retaliation claim could be brought; 2) state law did not provide a whistleblower exception to the employment-at-will doctrine; and 3) plaintiff did not make out a claim for tortious interference.
[11/17]
Goldstein v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles In a claim alleging that defendants wrongfully obtained plaintiff's conviction for murder based on their pattern and practice of misusing the testimony of jailhouse informants, grant of plaintiff's Penal Code section 924.2 petition seeking access to grand jury materials is reversed where California courts do not have a broad inherent power to order disclosure of grand jury materials to private litigants.
More...
|
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
Hollis, Wright & Harrington, P.C., Attorneys at Law, located in Birmingham, Alabama, represent clients throughout Huntsville, Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, Florence, Gadsden, Mobile, Dothan, Auburn, Jefferson County, Madison County, Montgomery County, Tuscaloosa County, Shelby County, Talladega County, and surrounding communities, as well as in Mississippi, Georgia and Florida.
Hollis, Wright & Harrington, P.C., Attorneys at Law
Suite 1500 Financial Center
505 North 20th Street
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Telephone: 205-324-3600
Facsimile: 205-324-3636
Toll-Free: 877-324-3636
|